No, not like that. Didn't join a cult, or new religion. Converted my camera system from Sony full frame to micro 4/3. I went in one day to Precision Camera to pick up some film and ended up speaking with the Olympus rep. Super nice guy, checked out the prints he had at the store, and I was intrigued. Then he started to show me the kit. I was curious to the EM-5 as I had seen it hanging around the neck of some photographers I follow. See Sean Archer, Juan Gonzalez, Jamie MacDonald
My curiousity led me to rent it from Borrowlenses.com. They have a great selection and super speedy service so I grabbed the EM-5 and the 12-40 2.8 PRO M. Zuiko lens. Immediately I could feel a weight difference between the Sony a7r II and the Oly.
How does it feel?
Olympus equipment feels great. Solid metal design, textured barrel, zoom, and focus rings. Sealed bodies and lenses (PRO lenses) give me a comfort factor when travelling. Virtually none of my Sony gear was weather sealed.
Yes, but how does it feel?
Oh...weight. Body weighs in at 410 grams, compared to 625 grams. The 12-40 lens is really a 24-80 35mm equivalent, and comes in at 382 grams. (Micro 4/3 has a 2x crop factor, unlike APS-C which is 1.5x). Total net weight of 792 grams for camera and lens. Sony 24-70 equivalent at 2.8 is a hefty 886 grams bringing the Sony 1 body and 1 lens to over 1500 grams. 1.5 kg for just one part of the kit. I'd also be carrying the 70-200 (1480 grams) and the 16-35 F/4 (839 grams). That's quite a kit and only 1 body/3 lenses.
My Olympus setup is as follows:
- 12-40 2.8 Pro (24-80mm equiv)
- 45 1.8 (90mm equiv)
- 75 1.8 (150mm equiv)
- 40-150 (80-300mm equiv)
- EM-5 Body
Total weight at: 2.03 Kg
I have a kit from 24-300mm, 2.8 aperture or less, and 1 body for the same as I would the 70-200 and a7r II. That makes a huge difference.
How much you got?
Next factor is price. I sold the a7r II for a good price and was able to get 75% of the kit above at new retail price in turn. The Sony selection is not only getting larger, but more cost prohibitive. The 24-70 lens alone is more than the EM-5 and 12-40 put together. Selling off 3 other lenses will net me enough to get the 40-150 and be fully recovered on the switch. My range has extended from 35,55,14,85 to now having full coverage from 24-300 mm. All with fast, pro glass.
You're going to miss it
That's what I told myself. "Don't do it, you already invested, it's great glass and superb mirrorless system." I mulled this decision for the week I had the rental. I looked at everything I could. Here is what I will be giving up.
- full size sensor (35mm)
- small loss of depth of field (of which yet I can't find a noticeable difference)
- Ergonomics - the EM-5 is smaller but I shoot with the Sony A6000, so i'm used to a smaller grip. That is what my rapid strap is for :)
- Internal 4K - didn't use this much at all, but it was beautiful
- 42mp sensor - the files were big and lots of detail, but i haven't had any issues with the 16mp files from Olympus. Plenty of detail still, little more noise if you pixel peep, but that is expected.
Ok, so what do the shots look like?
Here are some shots I've taken thus far. I've really enjoyed the flexibility of the kit.
Does it shoot video?
You bet. Here's a ttimelapse I shot the other morning. I've also shot a couple of ad-hoc videos of the kids.
Lightweight, compact, stunning photo and video. I'm converted. It is a rough feeling going thru a system change. I changed to mirrorless the year before, moved over from Nikon. I didn't get much gear when I moved to Sony. Beautiful system but the move was mainly for me to get my gear moving. Needed to be light, capable, and versatile. I think I've found my system. (watch me post a year later I'm with Fuji.....lmao)